Illegal Immigration Causes Climate Change

BOTTOM LINE UP FRONT – “Controlled immigration is imperative for environmental sustainability. ”  Now read on->

Do you think that’s a crazy fake news headline?  Not so quick.  Saying Climate Change may be a little over the top a little, but illegal immigration does harm the environment.

When Hoover Dam was built in Nevada creating Lake Mead, Las Vegas had a population of 25,000 people.  Today, Las Vegas mindlessly invites and welcomes illegals and the population has exceeded 1.5 million people to include North Las Vegas and Henderson and Lake Mead is more than 100 feet low.

It’s fair to say that a drought has had some impact on the water level however, it’s delusional to believe that an extra million people is not having an impact on the water resources.  It’s TRUE. The more people you have, the more water is consumed.  But not only is there more water consumed, there’s more food consumed, more oxygen and nitrogen is consumed out of the air=more greenhouse gases (thanks illegals), more fuel is consumed in transportation, more lanes of highways causing more sheet-wash preventing rainwater from reaching the aquifers.  In the west, the animals are looking left and right for more water just to survive the day, but the Liberals have invited all of the humans to consume all the water resources.  As a scientist I can go on.  I would like for you to hear me because, I’m a scientists and Bill Nye the Science Guy whom you like to listen to is not a scientist–Bill Nye’s Wikipedia page calls him an “Entertainer.”  In fact, most of the people whose names are on the UN Climate Study are not scientists either–turns out that anyone who even accidently read that UN report on climate change whether they agreed to the non-scientific report or not had their name added to it to include clerks and aides.

UN Agenda 21 is about creating a Global One Class Society of poor people controlled by the wealthy and political elite.  Would it surprise you that George H. Bush signed us onto this UN Agenda?   The same people who get $60M book deals and $400K speaking fees (Obama – the guy who talks about sharing the wealth but doesn’t’) will be the leaders of this flock of Sheeple controlled by this UN Agenda–its about controlling you and keeping them rich–it has nothing to do with the environment.  This UN Agenda openly states that Environmental causes will be the rational for controlling ‘We The People.’  When this UN Agenda was conceived is when the Government lies of Global Cooling and Global Warming began.

These lies have been on the Cover of Time, time and again.  In Hitler’s book Mein Kamph he expressed his Psychological Warfare tactics of “Tell a lie, keep repeating the lie, eventually people will believe the lie.”  People have been hearing this Climate Change LIE for so long they believe it is real–they have been program by a World War II tactic.

Yeah, people have been believing these climate changes lies for a long time.  If they can’t make you believe in GLOBAL COOLING as they tried in the 1970s, they will try with GLOBAL WARMING as they tried in the early 2000s, and if that doesn’t work they will simply go with CLIMATE CHANGE which is the new MANTRA for the easily programmed.

Regardless, if you believe it environmentally sound to over populate an area with legal or illegals, you’re delusional.  To believe that there will be a positive outcome by importing a group of people to areas already strained in water resources because it makes you feel good to be a human, demonstrates that you can’t see far enough forward to understand that harm you will do to humanity through this shallow mindset.

Controlled immigration is imperative for environmental sustainability.

Question for California Governor Jerry Brown

Governor Brown,

You seem to be concerned with Environmental Sustainability yet you are insistent on allowing all persons safe passage to migrate to California legally or illegally.  Do you consider the environmental consequences of such migration?

With more people there are:

  • More cars and trucks which equates to:
    • More fuel consumption which equates to:

      • More oil rigs off the coast

      • Potential for oil spills in the ocean

      • More air pollution

    • Wider highways which equates to:

      • More mining for limestone to make the cement

      • More mining for the iron rebar to reinforce the concrete

      • More mining requires heavy equipment and truck and electric won’t work

      • More sheet-wash of water

  • More demands for food which equates to:

    • More farms which require fuel intensive heavy equipment

    • More fuel intensive trucks to haul the produce to market

    • More grocery stores

    • More parking lots resulting in more sheet wash of rain water

  • More demands for water

    • More dams

      • Dams are vulnerable to terrorists attacks

      • Dams destructively alter nature

      • Every time you build a dam, you create a vulnerable population

These are just a few examples of what a larger population brings to California and at some point we simply will no longer be able to sustain this larger population.

You can’t depend on the rest of the United States to save California; the rest of the United States refers to California as “COMMIEfornia” for some very valid reasons and would be fine seeing the vastly non-thinking Liberal population of the state die in an over-population self-inflicted environmental disaster (the irony).

QUESTION- How many people can California sustain before the Environmental Resources collapse leading to our future Liberal-Made environmental disaster?  When answering this question remember that this future disaster is your Legacy and how future history books will remember you.

Fake News = Propaganda – BUT WHAT’S THE PURPOSE?

When we talk about Fake News, we’re talking about Propaganda.  A lie is a lie, propaganda is a lie with a purpose;.   We need to understand why America as a whole is being lied to and subjected to Propaganda.  It’s not a matter of Republicans or Democrats, it’s really a matter of the political-wealthy elite and the rest of us.  Some people say it’s the 1% versus the 99%, that’s a nice thought because it’s close, but still not hitting the nail on the head.  Let’s make sense of it.

The U.S. Army Psychological Warfare Command was the first of the Special Operations career fields stood up during WWII to combat Adolph Hitler’s Propaganda.  Hitler’s book “Mien Kampf,” written with the assistance of Hitler’s Minister of Propaganda had what he called the “Big Lie” approach- “Tell a big lie, keep repeating the lie, eventually people will believe the lie.”  My name is Rex, I’m a career Psychological Warfare soldier and I would like to introduce you to what’s happening and some of the Big Lies we are subjected to.

In psychological warfare, the operators identify the target audiences whether the targets are senior, millennials, children, or an ethnicity.  Then the operators determine what the vulnerabilities and susceptibilities are of these target audiences, and create media to exploit those vulnerabilities.  A senior citizen will be vulnerable to themes about social security and retirement.  People with medical conditions are vulnerable to themes about healthcare.  Those with children are vulnerable to themes about education and safety.  Every demographic has a vulnerability, they are susceptible to specific themes, and there are preferred media to reach those demographics.  For seniors it may be a newspaper, the 40 something it may be broadcast media, millennials it may be Facebook.  What are your vulnerabilities?  Recognize your vulnerabilities and be on alert when you see some organization exploiting your vulnerability.  Talk about it with your family and friends; everybody needs to see what’s happening.

The majority of the media is lying, conducting deception operations, twisting reality, skewing what is true, and hiding the sinister truth about some political candidates like George H. Bush, George W. Bush, Barack Obama, JEB Bush, Bernie Sanders, or Hillary Clinton. Put how you feel about these politicians aside and look for the truth.  The large broadcast media companies report the news based on the vision of their Board Members and these Board Members are the filthy rich of the world, not just the US. 

         So why are we being subjected to Propaganda?


UN Agenda 21 is about creating a Global One-Class Society of Poor People Controlled by the Political and Wealthy Elite–This is a real UN Agenda.  George H. Bush signed us onto UN Agenda 21.  That probably doesn’t surprise many people who identify as Democrats, but bewilders those who identify as Republicans.  Let’s put those left and right labels aside because what UN Agenda 21 is about is not American, they are using our identities of Republicans and Democrats to pit Americans against each other.  We need to be Americans united now, not Divided.

The crux of UN Agenda 21 has several key aspects which constitution the BIG LIE:

  1. Environmental Sustainability
    1. Accountability of all earth resources
    2. Use Man-Made Climate Change as the rational to control people
    3. Reduce earth’s population by about 80%
  2. Common Core Education
  3. Create a homogenous society of poor people

Environmental Sustainability-  Those wealthy and political elite people embrace the term ‘environmental sustainability.’  It’s true that our  world cannot sustain the population growth; these very same wealthy and politically powerful people who embrace reducing the earth’s population by 80% also embrace Common Core Education for us, not for their children.  Mindful, the wealthy do not let their children go to public schools where Common Core is taught.  Section III of UN Agenda 21 is about using “Common Teaching” in the public schools as they call it, or rather “Common Core” as the Department of Education calls it to train children into accepting more Government control in the name of Environmental protection.

In this mantra of Environmental Sustainability is the Big Lie of Man-Made Climate Change–Remember Lies with a reason “Propaganda” has a purpose.

           Who said that Man-Made Climate Change is real or is a hazard?

The UN who created UN Agenda 21 also created the IPCC to back up their ‘Big Lie’ of Man-Made Climate Change.  Seriously, what thinking person trusts the UN?  In this IPCC more than 450 ‘lead authors’ (so they say) have received input from more than 800 contributing authors, and an additional 2,500 experts reviewed the draft documents.   In this, they cut and pasted what they wanted into the report.  I’m also a degreed geologist.  In geology, we use the entire data range of 4.5B years of data to say Climate Change is NATURAL, but to say it is Man-Made is a LIE.  The Climatologists (Fake Scientists) Cherry Pick data out of the last 4M years to prove that Mankind has caused climate change.  Real Scientists don’t cherry pick data to prove a point, real scientists use the entire data range and accept the fact which results. However, if you believe this lie, you will be willing to accept more Government control over your life.

Out of the full data range, what percentage of data do Climatologists use to say climate change is man-made?  The answer- 0.08% of the full data range.  Why would anyone believe as a scientific fact an answer which only uses 0.08% of the available data?

Fastest Way of Protecting the Environment-

The most important and fastest way of protecting the environment is to reduce the population and reduce it quickly to protect the earth’s resources for wealthy and powerful people.

        What’s the easiest way of reducing the earth’s population by 80%?

Breakdown country borders by turning a blind-eye to illegal immigration and consolidate the people who add the least value to society in specific locations such as Los Angeles, San Francisco, Portland, Seattle, Austin, Denver, New York, Miami, Toronto, Paris, London, Rome, Berlin, Moscow, Shanghai, New Delhi, Rio de Janeiro, Mexico City… and introduce a plaque.

We hear them talk about a New World Order- they have a plan and many of us are too enthralled with reality TV to see what is really happening around us.



Make Illegals Self-Deport

Deporting all of the illegals would be incredibly expensive, but what if we make them Self-Deport?

       It’s easy-

Make E-Verify mandatory for all businesses big and small and mandatory for college education and any benefits that an American may receive.  Then fine all business and organization who don’t comply.

If the illegals cant get a job, go to college, or receive free stuff at the expense of the American Taxpayers, then that illegal will go home.

Where We Went Wrong & Why We Deserve Trump

Chapter 2: Our Slipping Standards

At one time our leaders of the Democratic Party were the epitome of integrity and the very foundation in which ethical principles were developed.  We settled for nothing less than the best.

In 2016, the Republicans had 12 candidates running for office of the president and Trump became their nominee; it seems a large field serves to confuse people.   Back in 1976, the Democrats had 14 candidates running for office of the president.  Do we see the similarity?  Of course the nominee in 1976 became Jimmy Carter, the most bubbling excuse for a president we’ve ever had was elected and our standards caved from there on out.

With Carter giving back the Panama Canal and letting the Muslims in Iran and take over the U.S. Embassy and holding our Embassy staff of 52 diplomats hostage for 444 days, the Republicans won the next election with a landslide.  From thereon out,  Democrats began voting for historical first and lies rather than the character we once demanded in our candidates.

There was the historic first such as Bill Clinton, America’s first black President so they said back then.  Clinton’s win was actually based lies.  Clinton employed a person named Mark Penn as a pollster who discerned what Americans were actually concerned about.  With this information Clinton went on to lie telling every American what they wanted to hear.  This is also known as the “Big Lie” technique.  “Tell a lie, keep repeating the lie, eventually people will believe the lie” (Goebbels, 1925).  Clinton promised that taxes would only increase on persons making more than $200,000.00 per year but after he was elected the New York Times reported taxes were increasing on every family making more than $20,000.00 per year.  It seemed zeros were frequently misplaced to the detriment of the people and we reelected him.  We were lied to, we were harmed by the lies, and still we voted for him.

              What’s wrong with us?

After eight years of G.W. Bush, we were desperate for anything and along came Barack Obama promising “Hope and Change.”  It would be a historic first, America’s first half-black President and many of us voted for him because he was black.  Voting for someone because of their skin color or gender is positively the wrong rational and one of our Party’s greatest failures in the recent past.  President Obama would go on to break every campaign promise.  He would stop Government spying on the people, he would repel the Patriot Act, would create Universal Healthcare and passed it off as free healthcare for the poor with sad tear-jerking stories about his mother suffering breast cancer.  ALL LIES.

As I write this, a multitude of poor Americans who can’t afford healthcare insurance are now paying ObamaCareFines.  And still we exalt this liar as something great.  Under Obama the country’s credit rating has been reduced twice and he blamed Bush for all of his failures and we accepted this.  Of course, there was a new breed of Democrat on the scene, this new Democrat was a bully through and through.  If you said anything about Obama that was not glowing with adoration as if Mr. Obama were the Messiah as Barbara Walters would one day describe him, you would be denounced as a RACIST.  With this also came other hater-nouns this new breed of Democrat would subject everyone to in an effort to force people to defend themselves rather than address President Obama’s failures.  The word “RACIST” has been spewed about so frequently for anything and everything that the word has lost its meaning.

Chapter 3: Our Hypocrisy

The Democratic Party has become the Party of Hypocrites and we KNOW IT.  We must address this failing of ours and confront it head-on.

The Right sees our hypocrisy, why can’t we see it?

Gun Control Hypocrisy-

We use children as a psychological tool to demand more gun control.  We come up with catch phrases such as: “If it will save just one child’s life, we should consider stronger gun control.”  Then we turn around and demand greater access to abortion which kills 3,500,000 children before they are even born.   Can we expect the Right to believe the Left’s message on gun control when we speak out of both sides of our mouth on the topic of children’s lives?  The answer is a clear and simple ‘NO.’

We don’t even know why we want more gun control; it’s not for safety but we pretend it is.  We take a simple semiautomatic rifle and attempt to demonize it by calling it an “Assault Weapon.”  The Right retorts that a firearm cannot exhibit the human behavior of ‘assault’ and accuses the Left of dialog manipulation and they are correct in doing so.  These “Assault Weapons” we speak of kill fewer Americans each year than hammers and this is simply an FBI statistic which the Right defers to.

The 2nd Amendment reads:

“A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”

The reason why the forefathers codified the 2nd Amendment into our Constitution is that they experienced an abusive and oppressive government; they called it “Tyrannical.”  Our first Democratic President, Thomas Jefferson said:  “Tyranny is defined as that which is legal for the government but illegal for the citizenry.”  The purpose of the 2nd Amendment plain and simple is to ensure Americans can keep firearms, and if the people in our Government should ever become tyrannical, the people should pick up their rifles, form into militias, become disciplined (regulated), and dispose of those people in our Government who are tyrannical.  This concept is not anti-American Government but rather pro-American Government in every manner—the tyrannical people in our government will simply try to rebrand these pro-American Government militia as anti-government which is false—much like the abusive English crown called the American Patriots anti-government and traitor in the 1700s’, we should never forget the history of our greatest Democratic leaders or we will become what they fought against.  Every time we see our current day Democratic leaders reach for American guns, the Americans grip their guns tighter, they buy more guns and ammo, and they form into militias.  This has never been more true than under President Obama; an English TV station is now putting together a documentary on the American Militia Movement.

While Eric Holder was the Attorney General for President Obama, he said that we need “we to brainwash people to think about guns in a vastly different way” (Holder, 1995).  And this is what our Democratic leadership set out to do; brainwash us.  Is it really the job of our Government to brainwash us?  We now have a new illness in America called ‘Hoplophobia’ which is a mental illness characterized by the irrational fear of guns and fear of armed civilians.

If we are truly Democrats with a Democratic message, we should not be attacking the American Bill of Rights or the 2nd Amendment in an attempt to oppress American freedoms but rather come up with a Democratic solution to the violence in our country.  Given that hammers kill more Americans than assault weapons and Timothy McVeigh killed 168 people while wounding more than 800 others during an assault weapons ban, I would suggest that our efforts to demonize the 2nd Amendment and firearms is the wrong approach—A Democratic approach would be to stop people who want to kill and will kill with or without a gun.  I also suggest that this is directly tied to how we raise our children and the values we instill upon our children which is another topic to be addressed.

Republicans Have A War On Women Hypocrisy-

We watched and listened to Bill Clinton say this about the Republicans and yet we exalt Bill as a hero, even though he sodomized a young lady with a cigar.

          Why do we do that? 

         Are our standards that low?

As most of us understand, the “War on Women” tagline we use is about Republicans attempting to restrict abortion or said otherwise, control women’s healthcare.  However, if we stopped and looked at the history of this conflict, we may begin to understand where this Republican fight began and find a way of putting an end to it.  Not all of our Democratic Party history is pleasant, and this led to the conflict on abortion.

BACKGROUND leading up to the Abortion Conflict-

Historically, this abortion conflict has its roots firmly planted in slavery and most of know little to nothing about it; let us have a superficial understanding of the subject so we may come up with a Democratic solution to our impasse.  While the Democratic Party was created in 1828, the much young Republican Party was created in 1854 as an emancipation movement with one simple creed – That slavery is a violation of the rights of man.  Republicans fought to free the slaves and Democrats as a whole opposed freeing the slaves (yes times have changed).  It was the first Republican President, Abraham Lincoln who was wrote the Emancipation Act—Today, many Democrats are so embarrassed by our history that we try to say Lincoln was a Democrat.  We should simply own our history and learn from it.  After the Civil War, the Republicans wrote the 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments giving former slaves citizenship and voting rights.  The Democratic Party responded with a lot of propaganda calling the Republican Party the Party of the Negro and posted a variety of posters like the one seen below.

The KKK was formed out of former Confederate Soldiers which is why the KKK is found in the South.  The first gun control laws were established to prevent former slaves from owning guns and defending themselves from the KKK.  The response, the Republicans created the National Rifle Association (NRA) in 1871 to ensure free blacks could keep and bear arms; Democrats responded to the NRA with hate and disdain.

This racial conflict continued and eventually a woman named Margaret Sanger, who was aligned with the Democratic Party pronounced that blacks were “human weeds” among many other distasteful labels.  Sanger went on to form the organization called “Planned Parenthood.”  In doing so, Sanger ensured the majority of abortion clinics were in black neighborhoods.

While this was taking place in the black neighborhoods in the 1960, the Bureau of Indian Affairs, which formed in 1824 under Democratic President Andrew Jackson, began conducting forced sterilization of Indian women (Johansen, 1998).

Republicans saw this as attempted genocide of black people and native Americans and the conflict on the topic of abortion was born.  We have to get past this-  Republicans have completely over reacted to the poor conduct of Democrats of a half century ago and longer, and our response that Republicans have a War on Women is a lie we need to dispose of; if for no other reason than proving we are the better party.

We need to find a Democratic solution.  I propose that this, like many other subjects we will address, will find a common-ground solution to this problem in how we raise our children.   If we raise our children with good American values which includes self-respect and respect for others, the subject of abortion will so minuscule, that it need not be addressed.

Chapter 4: Raising Our Children

Once upon a time we raised our children to have American Values which included individual responsibility, self-respect, and respect for others-

They grew up to become great leaders like John F. Kennedy (JFK) who defended our country in WWII as the commander of a PT Boat in the Pacific, nearly killed by the Japanese when his boat was destroyed out from under him, and he went on to become our President and defended us during a nuclear standoff with the Communists in Cuba.   JFK said: “Don’t ask what your country can do for you, but ask what you can do for your country.”

They grew up to become great leaders like John Glenn who was a U.S. Marine Corps WWII fighter pilot, one of the Mercury Seven Astronauts leading America into Space, and of course a Democratic Party Senator representing us in the Senate.  Glenn said: “I pray every day and think everybody should.”

Today, our children don’t think like that.  Today our children think about what kind of free stuff can they get and they want handouts from the Government.  They will vote for free college and point to countries like Norway where they offer free college not understanding the ramifications.  In countries where the college is free, only the people selected by the government will go to college and the course of study will be selected by the government based on the needs of the country and the abilities of the proposed student.  The college hopeful student may find him or herself in a welding or plumbing program rather than college because those are the country needs.

             Where did we go wrong?

We did it to ourselves.  This problem is squarely blamed on the ‘We the Democrats’ and let me tell you how—much like the war on women account, there is more to it.  Before 1979 we didn’t have a Department of Education.  The education of our children took place entirely at the state level with no federal influence and with this state based education system we put Americans on the Moon.  In 1979, Jimmy Carter created the Department of Education and since then we have become dumber and the Moon is out of reach.  The next thing Jimmy Carter did wrong was to put Government between the parents and the children.  Carter insisted it was child abuse to spank a child and with this, the newly developed career field of social workers finding employment in the school systems through a federal education program began reporting parents to the police for disciplining their children.

Parents at a loss for what to do with undisciplined children turned to the brand new mind-altering psychotropic drug Ritalin.   To call Ritalin and other psychotropic drugs “mind-altering” is a hard reality of the medication.  Today, all of our mass-murders in the U.S. were raised without the discipline which earlier generations had and with the Liberal use of mind-altering drugs.

What else happened with the newly developed Department of Education?  Gun Marksmanship was removed from our public education.  Before Jimmy Carter Liberalized our education system, students were taught gun safety and marksmanship in our schools.  They learned respect for guns, not fear.

The two below photos depicts a police officer giving a gun safety class and the second are girls having marksmanship training at school.  Taking gun safety and marksmanship out of our public education system has not been to the benefit of our country.

The other aspect of this federal encroachment into our children’s education was the removal of God from school the vilification of prayer.  When it comes to the Judeo-Christian values which made this the greatest nation on earth, why does the Democratic Party now insist total intolerance for Christianity in school?  This is a subject we will address further.

Through this federal education system, we moved to a program called “Common Core” which isn’t about ensuring exceptional children can advance but rather keeping all children common.   We are told that other countries are using the program and have higher grades in their schools.  It’s true that these other countries have higher grades, but with a common core, you are saddled with lower standards.   As smart Democrats, we should be quick to point out that these other countries have never put a person on the Moon.  However, there’s another reason why we moved to Common Core.  G.H. Bush signed the U.S. onto UN Agenda 21.  In Section III of UN Agenda 21, they discuss Common Teaching.

I believe we need a Democratic approach to raising our children, not a one-size-fits-all approach which the federal government has given us.  This Democratic approach is the same one Thomas Jefferson would have employed for his children.










Why Americans Don’t Trust The Media

Why Americans don’t trust the media?  There are many reasons.

Remember when four people forged the necessary signatures to get Obama on  the Ballet?  YEAP – Obama was elected through voter fraud and CNN, ABC,  CBS, NBC never reported on it.  See below link-  Obama was elected and  those people are in prison for getting him there.  That’s REAL NEWS.  Not  reporting this to make Liberals look good is a lie by omission = FAKE NEWS, and it keeps Americans uninformed.

Did you know that in California you can register to vote online, without an
ID, using the last four of a fake SSN?  YEAP – Voter fraud is very real in
CA.  The media will call Trump a liar about voter fraud, but the Liberal media REFUSES to conduct a little bit of investigative journalism such as registering to vote in California online.  Perhaps a motivated person will coordinate a national register to vote in California month just to make a point of the problem-



Liberal Code Words and Their Real Meaning


Liberal Code Words and Their Real Meaning

I sometimes find people who don’t actually know the difference between a Liberal and a Conservative.  Vocabulary is one of many ways to tell the difference. 

INCOME INEQUALITY – This is a catch phrase used by Liberals to make poorer people feel victimized.   This approach isn’t new, it was initiated by Karl Marx  Where he would discuss SHARE THE WEALTH in his manifesto.  The Liberal solution to Income inequality is always two-fold:

  1.  Raise the taxes on wealthy people to give free stuff to the poorer people.  Theoretically, you can raise the taxes on wealthy people until EQUALITY is achieved—Everyone will be equally poor.  This doesn’t work- In Ayn Rand’s book “Atlas Shrugged,” The wealthy people, movers and shakers of society when over-taxed will simply quit then who will the Liberals tax?  The poor people revolute and then there are food riots as seen in Venezuela and Greece.  Or, as British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher famously said:  “Socialism is great until you run out of other peoples’ money.”
  2. Raise the minimum wage.  This sounds great to people making minimum wage.  The idea that they will receive $15.00 hour is awesome, but don’t realize that every time in American history that the minimum wage is raised, to cost of everything goes up commensurate with the raise is wages and the net effect is ZERO.  However, the Government gets to tax you more in a socialized society; in most socialist countries the tax rate is 50%.  This becomes a quiz for the people who want socialized pay rates-  If you earn $7.50 per hour, get a raise to $15.00 per hour, and then get taxed at 50%, what is your new pay rate?

A Conservative will believe that if you are poor, you can change your job, work harder, and in America you can be anything you want be, to include wealthy.

A Liberal will believe that if you are poor, someone else should buy you stuff.

In the Liberal dialog, nearly every meaning is turned around. 

TRANSPARENT has become blackout.  Obama pledged the most transparent administration in history and that was a lie.  He had high ranking officials like Hillary Clinton using a private server to avoid responding to the Freedom of Information Act; otherwise keeping Americans uninformed about their Government’s actions.

TOLERANT, Liberals are tolerant of everything which denigrates Christian and American values; otherwise they are hateful and intolerant.   The person who enters the country illegally is no longer a law breaker, but just an undocumented person.

AFFORDABLE CARE ACT is an incredible joke.  Most people can’t afford the “affordable care” and the taxes levied by the IRS which are called fines to make us feel better are making the poorer even poorer.  It began as “Universal Health Care” which Hillary Clinton tried to push in 1993 as then First Lady.   We began to call it HillaryCare.  Then in 2008, Obama stole Hillary’s idea, which was actually, Vladimir Lenin’s idea.  Vladimir Lenin declared that “Socialized medicine is the keystone to the arch of the socialist state.”  Nonetheless, Obama was elected and with a Democrat controlled House and Senate, the Affordable Care Act AKA ObamaCare was launched.  Ronald Reagan warned us of ObamaCare in 1963 and it seems people thought they were going to get free healthcare 

Where the Liberal is incredibly easy to spot is when they talk about GUN CONTROL.  Gun Control is entirely about people control.  The Liberals will use every toy in they psychological warfare chest to exploit the program the American people into turning against the 2nd Amendment.  They will say we need more gun control if it will save just one child’s life—in the next breath they may proclaim their support for abortion proving it’s not about children.  The 2nd Amendment was codified by the founders for the purpose of ensuring Americans could pick up their rifles, form into militias, become organized and discipline for the purpose of removing tyrants from our Government.  Only tyrants reach for our guns because they understand the purpose of the 2nd Amendment.   They will attempt to create preconceived notions about guns through their vocabulary by calling a semi-auto rifle an ASSAULT WEAPON.  The thinking American understands that a rifle cannot exhibit the human behavior of assault, but the others will be led to believe that the rifle is all about assault.   Truth be told, more people are killed each year in the US by hammers than rifles and fire is the most common form of mass-murder.  The term HIGH CAPACITY is met to lead the person into believing that the magazine capacity is too much.  A 30 round magazine is simply a standard capacity magazine and a 200 round drum is simply a standard capacity drum.   

The Liberals, in their efforts to vilify firearms, have created a new problem in the US known as Hoplophobia which is a mental illness characterized by the irrational fear of guns and armed civilians. 

Liberals, you hear them coming.

The U.S. Is A Republic, Not a Democracy

Share This With Others

The U.S. is a Republic, Not a Democracy.

Every time I turn around I hear Democrats like Hillary Clinton calling the US a Democracy and I wonder why would anyone run for public office without knowing what type of Government the US actually is.  Better yet, why would someone vote for someone this ignorant of our Government’s structure?   It doesn’t stop with Hillary, I hear the Liberal Media repeating the word “Democracy,” Democrats at large calling our country a “Democracy,” and of course the people who never paid attention in their Government and Civics classes also calling our great REPUBLIC a democracy.


  • In a Democracy, the majority rules, even at the expense of the minorities and our Constitution
  • In a Republic, the Constitution rules and protects all minorities despite of how abusive and bullying the majority may become

I would like to think that all Democrats and Republicans can agree that our country is, as it always has been, a Republic, and should never be called a Democracy.